<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Marketing Muscle &#187; bing.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internet-marketing-muscle.com/tag/bing-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internet-marketing-muscle.com</link>
	<description>Put some muscle in your Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Is Better for Finding Images</title>
		<link>http://www.internet-marketing-muscle.com/2745/bing-is-better-for-finding-images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internet-marketing-muscle.com/2745/bing-is-better-for-finding-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billspaced</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internet-marketing-muscle.com/?p=2745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that images add to a blog post. Heck, they add to anything, really. &#34;A picture is worth a thousand words&#34; has never been truer. In fact, sometimes a picture conveys more than words. In the past, I&#39;ve always gone to the old search standby, google, when looking for images. It&#39;s always worked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.internet-marketing-muscle.com/wp-content/uploads/bingLogo_reverse_lg.jpg" target="_blank"><img align="left" alt="bingLogo_reverse_lg" border="0" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2746" height="150" hspace="10" src="http://www.internet-marketing-muscle.com/wp-content/uploads/bingLogo_reverse_lg-150x150.jpg" title="bingLogo_reverse_lg" width="150" /></a>We all know that images add to a blog post. Heck, they add to anything, really. &quot;A picture is worth a thousand words&quot; has never been truer. In fact, sometimes a picture conveys more than words.</p>
<p>In the past, I&#39;ve always gone to the old search standby, google, when looking for images. It&#39;s always worked sufficiently.</p>
<p>However, I recently started using <a href="http://bing.com">bing</a>. It&#39;s the revamped search engine from Microsoft and it&#39;s wonderful for finding suitable pictures and other images for your blog, sales pages, etc. (always make sure you follow the copyright rules). The cool thing about a bing image search is that seemingly endless <strong>relevant</strong> search results appear. There is no endless paging through 10 results at a time. You just scroll down the page until you find what you&#39;re looking for.</p>
<p>The results are far more relevant and it&#39;s so much easier and quicker to find exactly what you&#39;re looking for.</p>
<p>I love <a href="http://bing.com">bing</a> image search!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internet-marketing-muscle.com/2745/bing-is-better-for-finding-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->